Psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Central Sensitization Inventory-9 in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

The aim of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Turkish version of Central Sensitization Inventory-9 (CSI-9) in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The methodological study included 92 patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The original version of the CSI-9 was translated and culturally adapted into Turkish. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated with Cronbach's α and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. The assessment of reproducibility was conducted with the standard error of measurement (SEM) and minimal detectable difference (MDD) values. Convergent validity was explored by correlation analysis between the CSI-9 and Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI-25), Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), and European Quality of Life Survey-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D). The structural validity was assessed with factor analysis. Floor and ceiling effects were also analyzed. We found a very good internal consistency (Cronbach's α of 0.83) and excellent test-retest reliability (ICC of 0.96) of the Turkish CSI-9. The SEM demonstrated a range between 0.19 and 1.12, and the MDD was observed to vary from 1.17 to 1.35. The CSI-9 correlated significantly with the CSI-25 ( r  = 0.77, P  < 0.001), the pain severity subscale of the BPI ( r  = 0.41 to 0.53, P  < 0.001), the pain interference subscale of the BPI ( r  = 0.21 to 0.58, P  = 0.02 to P  < 0.001), the EQ-5D ( r  = 0.24 to 0.48, P  < 0.05), and the EQ-5D visual analog scale ( r  = -0.41, P  < 0.001). One factor was identified within the CSI-9. Our data suggest that the Turkish CSI-9 is reliable and valid outcome measure for assessing CS in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain.

Assessment of reliability and quality of YouTube® exercise videos in people with rheumatoid arthritis.

BACKGROUND: YouTube®, one of the busiest video-sharing platforms, may lack sufficient or accurate information on health information and practices given the absence of a rigorous evaluation process. PURPOSE: This study aims to evaluate the reliability of information and quality of exercise videos on YouTube® for rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Video features and the source of the upload were sorted. Reliability of the information shared in the videos was evaluated using the mDISCERN too, and quality was assessed using the Global Quality Scale and JAMA scoring system. Videos were independently analyzed by two physiotherapists specialized in rheumatologic rehabilitation. Any bias was resolved by an independent third assessor. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-four exercise videos were included. A hundred and twenty-six (94%) of the 134 exercise videos were found to be useful, and 8 (6%) were misleading. The useful and misleading videos had similar numbers of views, likes, comments, and subscribers (p > .05), while video duration and time since upload were higher for useful videos (p < .05). Cohen's Kappa scores demonstrated that the level of agreement between the assessors were moderate (mDISCERN = 0.417, Global Quality Scale = 0.582, and JAMA = 0.555). There was a significant difference in JAMA scores (p = .013) between the sources of the videos. However, no significant difference was found in mDISCERN (p = .104) and Global Quality Scale (p = .128) scores. CONCLUSION: YouTube® exercise videos provide partially reliable and moderate-quality information for people with rheumatoid arthritis. However, patients should be cautious and not rely directly on YouTube® exercise videos. Instead, they should consult a physician or physical therapist for exercises.

Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Pelvic Obliquity Measurement Methods in Patients With Idiopathic Scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: Despite the importance of the assessment of pelvic obliquity, especially in the planning of surgery, there is no consensus on the pelvic obliquity measurements. The purpose of this study is to assess the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of 4 different pelvic obliquity measuring methods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (IS): the Osebold, O'Brien, Maloney, and Allen&Ferguson methods. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 85 posteroanterior full-spine radiographs in the standing position of patients with IS involving the pelvic obliquity was evaluated by a team of 3 raters. The same researcher recorded the curve magnitude, apical vertebral rotation, Risser grade, curve pattern, and femoral head height difference. The pelvic obliquity angle was measured using the Osebold, O'Brien, Maloney, and Allen&Ferguson methods. The same graders were asked to regrade the same radiographs after at least 1 month. RESULTS: The Osebold method showed the highest interobserver reliability with an ICC of 0.994 and 0.983. The Allen&Ferguson method had the lowest reliability with an ICC of 0.911 and 0.934, but all of the methods were considered having excellent reliability. The Osebold method also showed the highest intraobserver reliability, ranging from 0.909 to 0.997. The Allen&Ferguson method had the lowest intraobserver reliability, with a range of 0.741 to 0.960. Also, all observers preferred the Osebold Method. The observers reported that the Allen&Ferguson method was considered the most time-consuming method, while the least time-consuming method was specified as the Osebold method. CONCLUSIONS: To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first to evaluate the intraobserver and interobserver reliability of pelvic obliquity among common measurement methods in patients with idiopathic scoliosis. All methods were evaluated as having excellent to good reliability in this study, but the Osebold method is the most reliable method of measuring pelvic obliquity on a frontal view radiograph in idiopathic scoliosis. The Osebold method is easier to use as it requires only the iliac crests to be visualized. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-Retrospective cohort study.